Editing Eth5. How jazz relates to ethics (section)

===<span style="color:fuchsia">'''Overall Conclusions'''</span>===

<span style="color:blue">People have accused jazz of being immoral.  The burden of proof lies on the proponents of immorality and not on the defenders of the counter claim.  Immoral had several different and incompatible meanings.  Of the meanings considered for immoral above, namely, (1) not moral because violating a moral principle, (2) not conforming to the patterns of conduct usually accepted or established as consistent with principles of personal and social ethics, or (3) licentious or lascivious, we saw that for the first two, jazz does not violate any moral principles, and is generally consistent with personal and societal ethics.  Regarding the third issue of being lascivious, even if some jazz tunes or performances are such, it does not contaminate the entire jazz genre as being licentious or immoral in this sense any more than it does so for other genres of music, such as rock, country, or pop that can also sometimes be lascivious. </span> 

<span style="color:purple">(Q1) What does immoral mean? (Q2) Is it true that something with these three properties is immoral? and (Q3) does jazz have these three properties?</span>
----

<div align="center">[[file:ColorfulSilhouettesCompositeRichBlueBackground.jpeg|link=http://www.google.com/search?q=jazz+silhouette&client=safari&hl=en-us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjMloD-2rL1AhVTI0QIHdbeCu8Q_AUoAXoECAIQAw&biw=1366&bih=895&dpr=2|alt=A framed composite of colored and black silhouettes of seven jazz groups of various sizes in three tiers with two couples in center dancing to swing music on a rich blue background with PoJ.fm logos.]]</div>

----