• PhilosophyOfJazz.net
  • Edit
    • Personal
      • Log in
    • Page
      • Page
      • Discussion
      • History
    • Tools
      • Page information
      • Permanent link
      • Printable version
      • Special pages
      • Related changes
      • What links here
Jump to: navigation, search
  • Home
  • About
  • Join Us!
  • PHILOSOPHY
  •    Ontology
  •    Epistemology
  •    Metaphysics
  •    Aesthetics
  •    Ethics
  •    Social and Political
  •    Ethnomusicology
  • JAZZ TOPICS
  •    Cognition
  •    Copyright and Music
  •    Discourses of Synchrony
  •    Improvisation
  •    Jazz Advice
  •    Jazz and Dance
  •    Jazz History
  •    Jazz Photography
  •    Jazz Theory
  •    Jazz Videos
  •    Mistakes
  •    Neuroscience
  •    Song Identity
  •    Time
  •    Events
  • CRITICAL MATERIALS
  •    Books
  •    Book Reviews
  •    Jazz Blogs
  •    Jazz Essays
  •    Jazz Resources
  •    Crazy Cool Jazz Stuff
  •    Kant's Genius Art Machine
  • WIKI
  •    Advanced Editing
  •    Format Philosophy
  •    How to Edit ("wikitext")
  •    Recent Changes
  •    Random Page
  • EVENTS
  • Ontmusic17. Good Music: What makes it good?

    Discussion[edit]


    What properties make for good music?[edit]

    “In effect, it should not be too difficult to understand Wimsatt and Beardsley's own intentions in writing the essay and attacking the "intentional fallacy." From their biographical data and the essay itself wc can clearly see that they are posing as "New Critics," are positing the "objective theory" that a literary work has an independent public existence, are encouraging "intrinsic studies" while discouraging "extrinsic studies" of literature, are trying to replace a system of values (covering the ideas of sincerity, fidelity, spontaneity, authenticity, genuineness, originality, etc.) with another system (integrity, relevance, unity, function, maturity, subtlety, adequacy, etc.), and are disputing the Romantic view of the author as an important source of meaning for works and they are doing all these by arguing that the author's intentions are not the proper concern of the critic.” [1] (bold not in original)

    NOTES[edit]

    1. ↑ Lindong Zhang, "The Intentional Fallacy" Reconsidered/LA RECONNAISSANCE DE "L'AFFECTIVE INTENTIONNELLE"," Canadian Social Science 8, no. 2, 2012. http://www.questia.com/read/1P3-2680647991/the-intentional-fallacy-reconsidered-la-reconnaissance.
    Retrieved from "http://philosophyofjazz.net/w/index.php?title=Ontmusic17._Good_Music:_What_makes_it_good%3F&oldid=6654"

    Philosophy of Jazz